Make your own free website on
AFP - November 1, 1999

Acute Appendicitis: Review and Update

Texas A&M University Health Science Center, Temple, Texas

Appendicitis is common, with a lifetime occurrence of 7 percent. Abdominal pain and anorexia are the predominant symptoms. The most important physical examination finding is right lower quadrant tenderness to palpation. A complete blood count and urinalysis are sometimes helpful in determining the diagnosis and supporting the presence or absence of appendicitis, while appendiceal computed tomographic scans and ultrasonography can be helpful in equivocal cases. Delay in diagnosing appendicitis increases the risk of perforation and complications. Complication and mortality rates are much higher in children and the elderly. (Am Fam Physician 1999;60:2027-34.)

Appendicitis is the most common acute surgical condition of the abdomen.1 Approximately 7 percent of the population will have appendicitis in their lifetime,2 with the peak incidence occurring between the ages of 10 and 30 years.3

Despite technologic advances, the diagnosis of appendicitis is still based primarily on the patient's history and the physical examination. Prompt diagnosis and surgical referral may reduce the risk of perforation and prevent complications.4 The mortality rate in nonperforated appendicitis is less than 1 percent, but it may be as high as 5 percent or more in young and elderly patients, in whom diagnosis may often be delayed, thus making perforation more likely.1


{short description of image}
Common Symptoms of Appendicitis

Common symptoms*
Frequency (%)
Abdominal pain ~100
Anorexia ~100
Nausea   90
Vomiting   75
Pain migration   50
Classic symptom sequence (vague periumbilical pain to anorexia/nausea/unsustained vomiting to migration of pain to right lower quadrant to low-grade fever)   50

*--Onset of symptoms typically within past 24 to 36 hours.
Information from references 3 through 5.
{short description of image}

The appendix is a long diverticulum that extends from the inferior tip of the cecum.5 Its lining is interspersed with lymphoid follicles.3 Most of the time, the appendix has an intraperitoneal location (either anterior or retrocecal) and, thus, may come in contact with the anterior parietal peritoneum when it is inflamed. Up to 30 percent of the time, the appendix may be "hidden" from the anterior peritoneum by being in a pelvic, retroileal or retrocolic (retroperitoneal retrocecal) position.6 The "hidden" position of the appendix notably changes the clinical manifestations of appendicitis.

Obstruction of the narrow appendiceal lumen initiates the clinical illness of acute appendicitis. Obstruction has multiple causes, including lymphoid hyperplasia (related to viral illnesses, including upper respiratory infection, mononucleosis, gastroenteritis), fecaliths, parasites, foreign bodies, Crohn's disease, primary or metastatic cancer and carcinoid syndrome. Lymphoid hyperplasia is more common in children and young adults, accounting for the increased incidence of appendicitis in these age groups.1,5

History and Physical Examination

Abdominal pain is the most common symptom of appendicitis.3 In multiple studies,3-5 specific characteristics of the abdominal pain and other associated symptoms have proved to be reliable indicators of acute appendicitis (Table 1). A thorough review of the history of the abdominal pain and of the patient's recent genitourinary, gynecologic and pulmonary history should be obtained.

Anorexia, nausea and vomiting are symptoms that are commonly associated with acute appendicitis. The classic history of pain beginning in the periumbilical region and migrating to the right lower quadrant occurs in only 50 percent of patients.1 Duration of symptoms exceeding 24 to 36 hours is uncommon in nonperforated appendicitis.1

{short description of image}
Significant Likelihood Ratios for Symptoms and Signs of Acute Appendicitis

Positive likelihood ratio (LR+)

Negative likelihood
ratio (LR-)

Right lower quadrant (RLQ) pain 8.0 RLQ pain§ 0 to 0.28†
Pain migration 3.2 No similar pain previously|| 0.3
Pain before vomiting 2.8 Pain migration 0.5
Anorexia, nausea and vomiting* Much lower LR+ than RLQ pain, pain migration and pain before vomiting Guarding 0 to 0.54†
Rigidity 3.76 Rebound tenderness 0 to 0.86†
Psoas sign 2.38 Fever, rigidity and psoas sign¶
Rebound tenderness 1.1 to 6.3†
Fever 1.9‡
Guarding and rectal tenderness* Much lower LR+ than rigidity, psoas sign and rebound tenderness

NOTE: LR is the amount by which the odds of a disease change with new information, as follows:
Likelihood ratio 
Degree of change in probability
>10 or <0.1  Large (often conclusive)
5 to 10 or 0.1 to 0.2  Moderate
2 to 5 or 0.2 to 0.5  Small (but sometimes important)
1 to 2 or 0.5 to 1  Small (rarely important)

*--These symptoms and signs have much lower LR+.
†--Ratios are presented in ranges for signs and symptoms that had widely varying results in studies.
‡--Fever had only borderline LR+.
§--That is, the absence of RLQ pain significantly lowers the odds of having appendicitis.
||--That is, the history of experiencing a similar pain previously lowers the odds of having appendicitis.
¶--These signs have higher LR-.
Information from references 7, 8 and 19
{short description of image}

In a recent meta-analysis,7 likelihood ratios were calculated for many of these symptoms (Table 2). A likelihood ratio is the amount by which the odds of a disease change with new information (e.g., physical examination findings, laboratory results).8 This change can be positive or negative. Symptoms such as anorexia, nausea and vomiting commonly occur in acute appendicitis; however, the presence of these symptoms does not necessarily increase the likelihood of appendicitis nor does their absence decrease the likelihood of the diagnosis. Moreover, other symptoms have more notable positive and negative likelihood ratios (Table 2).

{short description of image}
Common Signs of Appendicitis

• Right lower quadrant pain on palpation (the single most important sign)
• Low-grade fever (38°C [or 100.4°F])--absence of fever or high fever can occur
• Peritoneal signs
• Localized tenderness to percussion
• Guarding
• Other confirmatory peritoneal signs (absence of these signs does not exclude appendicitis)
• Psoas sign--pain on extension of right thigh (retroperitoneal retrocecal appendix)
• Obturator sign--pain on internal rotation of right thigh (pelvic appendix)
• Rovsing's sign--pain in right lower quadrant with palpation of left lower quadrant
• Dunphy's sign--increased pain with coughing
• Flank tenderness in right lower quadrant (retroperitoneal retrocecal appendix)
• Patient maintains hip flexion with knees drawn up for comfort

Information from references 3 through 5.
{short description of image}

A careful, systematic examination of the abdomen is essential. While right lower quadrant tenderness to palpation is the most important physical examination finding, other signs may help confirm the diagnosis (Table 3). The abdominal examination should begin with inspection followed by auscultation, gentle palpation (beginning at a site distant from the pain) and, finally, abdominal percussion. The rebound tenderness that is associated with peritoneal irritation has been shown to be more accurately identified by percussion of the abdomen than by palpation with quick release.1

As previously noted, the location of the appendix varies. When the appendix is hidden from the anterior peritoneum, the usual symptoms and signs of acute appendicitis may not be present. Pain and tenderness can occur in a location other than the right lower quadrant.6 A retrocecal appendix in a retroperitoneal location may cause flank pain. In this case, stretching the iliopsoas muscle can elicit pain. The psoas sign is elicited in this manner: the patient lies on the left side while the examiner extends the patient's right thigh (Figures 1a and 1b). In contrast, a patient with a pelvic appendix may show no abdominal signs, but the rectal examination may elicit tenderness in the cul-de-sac. In addition, an obturator sign (pain on passive internal rotation of the flexed right thigh) may be present in a patient with a pelvic appendix3 (Figures 2a and 2b).

Figure 1A
FIGURE 1A. The psoas sign. Pain on passive extension of the right thigh. Patient lies on left side. Examiner extends patient's right thigh while applying counter resistance to the right hip (asterisk).
Figure 1B
FIGURE 1B. Anatomic basis for the psoas sign: inflamed appendix is in a retroperitoneal location in contact with the psoas muscle, which is stretched by this maneuver.
Figure 2
FIGURE 2A. The obturator sign. Pain on passive internal rotation of the flexed thigh. Examiner moves lower leg laterally while applying resistance to the lateral side of the knee (asterisk) resulting in internal rotation of the femur.
Figure 2B
FIGURE 2B. Anatomic basis for the obturator sign: inflamed appendix in the pelvis is in contact with the obturator internus muscle, which is stretched by this maneuver.

The differential diagnosis of appendicitis is broad, but the patient's history and the remainder of the physical examination may clarify the diagnosis (Table 4). Because many gynecologic conditions can mimic appendicitis, a pelvic examination should be performed on all women with abdominal pain. Given the breadth of the differential diagnosis, the pulmonary, genitourinary and rectal examinations are equally important. Studies have shown, however, that the rectal examination provides useful information only when the diagnosis is unclear and, thus, can be reserved for use in such cases.5

{short description of image}
Differential Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis

Abdominal pain, cause unknown
Crohn's disease
Duodenal ulcer
Intestinal obstruction
Meckel's diverticulitis
Mesenteric lymphadenitis
Necrotizing enterocolitis
Neoplasm (carcinoid,
carcinoma, lymphoma)
Omental torsion
Perforated viscus
Ectopic pregnancy
Ovarian torsion
Pelvic inflammatory
Ruptured ovarian cyst
(follicular, corpus
Tubo-ovarian abscess

Diabetic ketoacidosis
Sickle cell disease
Henoch-Schönlein purpura
Pneumonia (basilar)
Pulmonary infarction

Kidney stone
Testicular torsion
Urinary tract infection
Wilms' tumor

Parasitic infection
Psoas abscess
Rectus sheath hematoma

Reprinted with permission from Graffeo CS, Counselman FL. Appendicitis. Emerg Med Clin North Am 1996;14:653-71.
{short description of image}

Laboratory and Radiologic Evaluation

If the patient's history and the physical examination do not clarify the diagnosis, laboratory and radiologic evaluations may be helpful. A clear diagnosis of appendicitis obviates the need for further testing and should prompt immediate surgical referral.

Laboratory Tests
The white blood cell (WBC) count is elevated (greater than 10,000 per mm3 [100 3 109 per L]) in 80 percent of all cases of acute appendicitis.9 Unfortunately, the WBC is elevated in up to 70 percent of patients with other causes of right lower quadrant pain.10 Thus, an elevated WBC has a low predictive value. Serial WBC measurements (over 4 to 8 hours) in suspected cases may increase the specificity, as the WBC count often increases in acute appendicitis (except in cases of perforation, in which it may initially fall).5

In addition, 95 percent of patients have neutrophilia1 and, in the elderly, an elevated band count greater than 6 percent has been shown to have a high predictive value for appendicitis.9 In general, however, the WBC count and differential are only moderately helpful in confirming the diagnosis of appendicitis because of their low specificities.

A more recently suggested laboratory evaluation is determination of the C-reactive protein level. An elevated C-reactive protein level (greater than 0.8 mg per dL) is common in appendicitis, but studies disagree on its sensitivity and specificity.4,5 An elevated C-reactive protein level in combination with an elevated WBC count and neutrophilia are highly sensitive (97 to 100 percent). Therefore, if all three of these findings are absent, the chance of appendicitis is low.5

In patients with appendicitis, a urinalysis may demonstrate changes such as mild pyuria, proteinuria and hematuria,1 but the test serves more to exclude urinary tract causes of abdominal pain than to diagnose appendicitis.

Figure 3
FIGURE 3. Ultrasonogram showing longitudinal section (arrows) of inflamed appendix.

Radiologic Evaluation
The options for radiologic evaluation of patients with suspected appendicitis have expanded in recent years, enhancing and sometimes replacing previously used radiologic studies.

Plain radiographs, while often revealing abnormalities in acute appendicitis, lack specificity and are more helpful in diagnosing other causes of abdominal pain. Likewise, barium enema is now used infrequently because of the advances in abdominal imaging.5

Ultrasonography and computed tomographic (CT) scans are helpful in evaluating patients with suspected appendicitis.11 Ultrasonography is appropriate in patients in which the diagnosis is equivocal by history and physical examination. It is especially well suited in evaluating right lower quadrant or pelvic pain in pediatric and female patients. A normal appendix (6 mm or less in diameter) must be identified to rule out appendicitis. An inflamed appendix usually measures greater than 6 mm in diameter (Figure 3), is noncompressible and tender with focal compression. Other right lower quadrant conditions such as inflammatory bowel disease, cecal diverticulitis, Meckel's diverticulum, endometriosis and pelvic inflammatory disease can cause false-positive ultrasonography results.12

{short description of image}
Comparison of Ultrasound and Appendiceal CT Evaluation of Suspected Appendicitis

Comparison graded ultrasound
Appendiceal computed tomographic scan
Sensitivity 85% 90 to 100%
Specificity 92% 95 to 97%
Use Evaluate patients with equivocal diagnosis of appendicitis Evaluate patients with equivocal diagnosis of appendicitis
Advantages Safe
Relatively inexpensive
Can rule out pelvic disease in females
Better for children
More accurate
Better identifies phlegmon and abscess
Better identifies normal appendix
Disadvantages Operator dependent
Technically inadequate studies due to gas
Ionizing radiation

Information from references 11, 13, 20.
{short description of image}

CT, specifically the technique of appendiceal CT, is more accurate than ultrasonography (Table 5). Appendiceal CT consists of a focused, helical, appendiceal CT after a Gastrografin-saline enema (with or without oral contrast) and can be performed and interpreted within one hour. Intravenous contrast is unnecessary.12 The accuracy of CT is due in part to its ability to identify a normal appendix better than ultrasonography.13 An inflamed appendix is greater than 6 mm in diameter, but the CT also demonstrates periappendiceal inflammatory changes14 (Figures 4 and 5). If appendiceal CT is not available, standard abdominal/pelvic CT with contrast remains highly useful and may be more accurate than ultrasonography.12


The standard for management of nonperforated appendicitis remains appendectomy. Because prompt treatment of appendicitis is important in preventing further morbidity and mortality, a margin of error in over-diagnosis is acceptable. Currently, the national rate of negative appendectomies is approximately 20 percent.15 Some studies have investigated nonoperative management with parenteral antibiotic treatment, but 40 percent of these patients eventually required appendectomy.3

Appendectomy may be performed by laparotomy (usually through a limited right lower quadrant incision) or laparoscopy. Diagnostic laparoscopy may be helpful in equivocal cases or in women of childbearing age, while therapeutic laparoscopy may be preferred in certain subsets of patients (e.g., women, obese patients, athletes).16

While laparoscopic intervention has the advantages of decreased postoperative pain, earlier return to normal activity and better cosmetic results, its disadvantages include greater cost and longer operative time.4 Open appendectomy may remain the primary approach to treatment until further cost and benefit analyses are conducted.

Figure 4
FIGURE 4. Computed tomographic scan showing cross-section of inflamed appendix (A) with appendicolith (a).
{short description of image}
FIGURE 5. Computed tomographic scan showing enlarged and inflamed appendix (A) extending from the cecum (C).


{short description of image}
The classic history of pain beginning in the periumbilical region and migrating to the right lower quadrant occurs in only 50 percent of patients.
{short description of image}

Appendiceal rupture accounts for a majority of the complications of appendicitis. Factors that increase the rate of perforation are delayed presentation to medical care,17 age extremes (young and old)18 and hidden location of appendix.6 A brief period of in-hospital observation (less than six hours) in equivocal cases does not increase the perforation rate and may improve diagnostic accuracy.18

Diagnosis of a perforated appendix is usually easier (although immediately after rupture, the patient's symptoms may temporarily subside). The physical examination findings are more obvious if peritonitis generalizes, with a more generalized right lower quadrant tenderness progressing to complete abdominal tenderness. An ill-defined mass may be felt in the right lower quadrant. Fever is more common with rupture, and the WBC count may elevate to 20,000 to 30,000 per mm3 (200 to 300 3 109 per L) with a prominent left shift.3

A periappendiceal abscess may be treated immediately by surgery or by nonoperative management.4 Nonoperative management consists of parenteral antibiotics with observation or CT-guided drainage, followed by interval appendectomy six weeks to three months later.1

Special Considerations

{short description of image}
The technique of appendiceal computed tomography is more accurate than ultrasonography in confirming the diagnosis of appendicitis.
{short description of image}

While appendicitis is uncommon in young children, it poses special difficulties in this age group. Young children are unable to relate a history, often have abdominal pain from other causes and may have more nonspecific signs and symptoms. These factors contribute to a perforation rate as high as 50 percent in this group.1

In pregnancy, the location of the appendix begins to shift significantly by the fourth to fifth months of gestation. Common symptoms of pregnancy may mimic appendicitis, and the leukocytosis of pregnancy renders the WBC count less useful. While the maternal mortality rate is low, the overall fetal mortality rate is 2 to 8.5 percent, rising to as high as 35 percent in perforation with generalized peritonitis. As in nonpregnant patients, appendectomy is the standard for treatment.3

Elderly patients have the highest mortality rates. The usual signs and symptoms of appendicitis may be diminished, atypical or absent in the elderly, which leads to a higher rate of perforation. More frequent perforation combined with a higher incidence of other medical problems and less reserve to fight infection contribute to a mortality rate of up to 5 percent or more.1

Final Comment

Prompt diagnosis of appendicitis ensures timely treatment and prevents complications. Because abdominal pain is a common presenting symptom in outpatient care, family physicians serve an important role in the diagnosis of appendicitis. Obvious cases of appendicitis require urgent referral, while equivocal cases warrant further evaluation and, many times, surgical consultation.

The author thanks Glen Cryer, Department of Publications, Scott and White Memorial Hospital, Temple, Tex., for help with the manuscript.

Figures 3 through 5 were provided by Michael L. Nipper, M.D., Department of Radiology, Scott and White Memorial Hospital, Temple, Tex.

The Author

is an assistant professor in the Department of Family Medicine at Scott & White Clinic and Memorial Hospital, Bellmead, Tex., affiliated with Texas A&M University Health Science Center in Temple. Dr. Hardin graduated from the University of Texas Medical School at Houston and completed a residency in family practice at the McLennan County Medical Education and Research Foundation, Waco, Tex.

Address correspondence to D. Mike Hardin, Jr., M.D., 556 North Loop 340, Bellmead, TX 76705. Reprints are not available from the author.


  1. Liu CD, McFadden DW. Acute abdomen and appendix. In: Greenfield LJ, et al., eds. Surgery: scientific principles and practice. 2d ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1997:1246-61.
  2. Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 1990;132:910-25.
  3. Schwartz SI. Appendix. In: Schwartz SI, ed. Principles of surgery. 6th ed. New York: McGraw Hill, 1994:1307-18.
  4. Wilcox RT, Traverso LW. Have the evaluation and treatment of acute appendicitis changed with new technology? Surg Clin North Am 1997;77:1355-70.
  5. Graffeo CS, Counselman FL. Appendicitis. Emerg Med Clin North Am 1996;14:653-71.
  6. Guidry SP, Poole GV. The anatomy of appendicitis. Am Surg 1994;60:68-71.
  7. Wagner JM, McKinney WP, Carpenter JL. Does this patient have appendicitis? JAMA 1996;276:1589-94.
  8. Quantitative aspects of clinical decision making. In: SAM-CD. Windows version CD-ROM. New York: Scientific American, 1999.
  9. Elangovan S. Clinical and laboratory findings in acute appendicitis in the elderly. J Am Board Fam Pract 1996;9:75-8.
  10. Calder JD, Gajraj H. Recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis. Br J Hosp Med 1995;54:129-33.
  11. Rao PM, Feltmote CM, Rhea JT, Schulick AH, Novelline RA. Helical computed tomography in differentiating appendicitis and acute gynecologic conditions. Obstet Gynecol 1999;93:417-21.
  12. Gupta H, Dupuy DE. Advances in imaging of the acute abdomen. Surg Clin North Am 1997;77: 1245-63.
  13. Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, McCabe CJ, Lawrason JN, Berger DL, et al. Helical CT technique for the diagnosis of appendicitis: prospective evaluation of a focused appendix CT examination. Radiology 1997;202:139-44.
  14. Paulman AA, Huebner DM, Forrest TS. Sonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Am Fam Physician 1991;44:465-8.
  15. Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, Mostafavi AA, McCabe CJ, et al. Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources. N Engl J Med 1998;338: 141-6.
  16. Geis WP, Miller CE, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: rationale and technical aspects. Contemp Surg 1992;40:13-9.
  17. Temple CL, Huchcroft SA, Temple WJ. The natural history of appendicitis in adults: a prospective study. Ann Surg 1995;221:278-81.
  18. Ricci MA, Trevisani MF, Beck WC. Acute appendicitis: a five year review. Am Surg 1991;57:301-5.
  19. Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Sackett DL. Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 1994;271:703-7.
  20. Orr RK, Porter D, Hartman D. Ultrasonography to evaluate adults for appendicitis: decision making based on meta-analysis and probabilistic reasoning. Acad Emerg Med 1995;2:644-50.

Copyright © 1999 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact for copyright questions and/or permission requests.

November 1, 1999 Contents | AFP Home Page | AAFP Home | Search